Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To print an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To print an article, click on the small Printer Icon located at the top right corner of the page, or by pressing Ctrl + P. Remember, PEP-Web content is copyright.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kitay, P.M. (1963). Summary. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 44:222-223.

(1963). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 44:222-223

Summary

Philip M. Kitay

In contrast with the six blind men of Hindustan grasping different parts of a living elephant and obstinately disagreeing about its configuration, we have on this panel four insightful men, three from New York and one from Texas, with individuality of apperceptive background and set, arriving at very similar conclusions upon examining the long-since departed Schreber. The conclusions arrived at were more frequently shared than unique. The panelists all cogently pursued psychodynamic and functionalist formulations, searching for greater specificity in the exposition of the origins and significance of symptoms. All expressed the Freudian 'Geist' in their dedication to psychodynamic explanations. If they found fault with Freud, it was mainly that Freud did not push his own principle of dynamic formulation far enough and broadly enough. But it has to be remembered that Freud himself, as Niederland repeatedly reminded us, spoke of his 'policy of restraint' in interpreting the Schreber case and accordingly refrained consciously from interpreting all its aspects.

The classical Freudian interpretation of paranoia and of the Schreber case was viewed as giving initially insufficient recognition to the importance of hostile destructive drives. Indeed, in later works Freud (1922), (1923) spoke of such hostile destructive elements, especially in the early sibling relation, as important components in paranoid or paranoiacally tinged formations. The panelists also acknowledged that Schreber's conflicts with his mother were very influential in the etiology of his illness.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.