Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Little, M. (1964). Comment on Dr Sperling's Paper. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 45:261-262.

(1964). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 45:261-262

Comment on Dr Sperling's Paper

Margaret Little

Sperling shows us two special instances of the function of the ego in maintaining the lowest possible level of tension—i.e. preserving homeostasis. He shows us the various ways in which the ego mobilizes id, superego, or outside world to this end, when faced with the specific unpleasure of a situation calling for modification of the ego itself, in order to avoid such modification.

The first instance is that of finding the means whereby unpleasurable material may be learnt, when such sublimations as have been formed are weak and precarious. The second is the analytic situation, where acceptance of interpretations involves modification of the ego; or rather, where acceptance of interpretations can come about only through an ego modification.

He is concerned here with the pathological aspects of what he has called the 'balancing' function of the ego, and he has made only passing reference to the normal aspects of this function. He has, however, given us some indication of the conditions in which these pathological developments occur, referring first to the tendency (in childhood) to repeat actively what has been, and is being passively experienced in infant and child care, and secondly to the pattern often set by the mother in early childhood of balancing pain with pleasure, and pleasure with pain.

The examples which Sperling quotes are familiar to all of us, and we have all suffered many times in the course of every analysis from the persistent refusal of interpretations by our analysands.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.