Login
Laing, R.D. (1964). General Psychopathology: By Karl Jaspers. (Manchester Univ. Press, 1963. Pp. 922. 75s.). Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 45:590-593.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1964). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 45:590-593

General Psychopathology: By Karl Jaspers. (Manchester Univ. Press, 1963. Pp. 922. 75s.)

Ronald D. Laing

This book is already regarded by many eminent psychiatrists as a major psychiatric classic. Jaspers is also regarded by many as a great philosopher, and this book can be seen as the golden touch on psychiatry of the finger of a master European thinker. Despite the fact that a number of people whom I respect hold Jaspers in high regard as a philosopher and as a psychologist, in my view there is a radical lack of discrimination on the highest level if Jaspers is classed among the great thinkers of recent European history. As a philosopher, Jaspers has produced an amalgam of the work of others, mainly of Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Max Weber—in a way that Sartre has called 'soft and underhand'.

As a psychopathologist, I find Jaspers even less satisfactory than Sartre finds him as a philosopher. For here, his grasp of large tracts of the subject is not merely undistinguished, it is inadequate. I refer the reader to his sections on dreams and his remarks on transference, repression, conflict, childhood, for instance.

Consider dreams. His account of the phenomena of dreams (pp. 144–145), based on Hacker, does not begin to grapple with the subject. In his section on dream-contents and their interpretation (pp. 372–376), not only does he not give evidence of a first-hand knowledge of the stuff of dreams, he virtually limits his account of dreaminterpretation to the work of Silberer, and he appears to have no understanding of the different functions

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.