Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To access to IJP Open with a PEP-Web subscription…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having a PEP-Web subscription grants you access to IJP Open. This new feature allows you to access and review some articles of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis before their publication. The free subscription to IJP Open is required, and you can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Pleune, F.G. (1965). All Dis-Ease is not Disease: A Consideration of Psycho-Analysis, Psychotherapy, and Psycho-Social Engineering. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 46:358-366.

(1965). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 46:358-366

All Dis-Ease is not Disease: A Consideration of Psycho-Analysis, Psychotherapy, and Psycho-Social Engineering

F. Gordon Pleune

Like the proverbial elephant examined by several blind men, psychiatry seems (or feels) remarkably different to various individuals who contact its different parts. With its rapid evolution into the legal, educational, welfare, and many other fields, the psychiatrist increasingly finds himself involved in matters quite far removed from medicine as it has been known in the past. There is need to examine what goes on, not only between psychiatrists and their various kinds of patients, but also the growing host of other personnel with whom they interact in the complex social structure of our day. It is vitally important that neither psychiatrists nor their heterogeneous clientele misunderstand, misrepresent, or misuse their relationship.

There are vast differences between medicine's earlier physicalistic concept of disease and treatment and the twentieth century tendency to conceive of all behaviour and feelings as manifestations of sickness or health. In our society an increasingly common tendency is to equate distress, dissatisfaction, or discomfort with sickness, and to assume there is an 'answer', a cure, an expectation that relief can be produced by scientific means. Individual and personal as well as group socio-economic and political problems are frequently classed as 'ills', and those who suffer from them are prone to expect relief through treatment by the appropriate 'doctor'. One is allowed, encouraged or sometimes forced to be dependent and to place responsibility in the hands of mental, economic, or political experts.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.