Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Sachs, O. (1967). Distinctions Between Fantasy and Reality Elements in Memory and Reconstruction. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 48:416-423.

(1967). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 48:416-423

Distinctions Between Fantasy and Reality Elements in Memory and Reconstruction

Oscar Sachs

The difficulties we frequently encounter in distinguishing between fantasy and reality elements in the "memories" of traumatic events brought to us by our patients, often seem insurmountable. The problem revolves in part about our own credulity, and as such, mirrors the discovery which played such an important role in the development of psycho-analysis. Freud's realization that many of the childhood seduction "memories" which he had originally believed, were in fact fantasies growing out of developmental conflicts and desires, led him to draw the conclusion that "as far as neurosis was concerned, psychical reality was of more importance than material reality" (Freud, 1925). With the expanded knowledge and understanding of the ubiquitous fantasies associated with infantile stages of development, our interest and accent has been placed more and more on fantasy, perhaps at times to the neglect of the accompanying events. Pragmatically almost, there seems to have developed an attitude that it made little difference whether a remembered traumatic event occurred or was fantasied; the latter, subjective, drive-dependent, experience came to be accorded the primary aetiological significance.

Although many of the interpretations and reconstructions we use during any analysis are often at best but approximations, (Reider, 1953) yet they exert dynamic and lasting effects upon the patient. We deal for the most part with "complex patterns" since, as Kris (1956) wrote,

the material of actual occurrences of things as they happen is constantly subjected to the selective scrutiny of memory under the guide of the inner constellation.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.