Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Valenstein, A.F. (1968). Indications and Contraindications for Psychoanalytic Treatment. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49:265-265.

(1968). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49:265-265

Indications and Contraindications for Psychoanalytic Treatment

Arthur F. Valenstein

After hearing the excellent papers by Zetzel and Kuiper it seems that our symposium topic "Indications and Contraindications for Psychoanalysis," really encompassing the issue of analysability, has been approached on two different but related levels of discourse.

Kuiper has called our attention to the fact that criteria for analysability are far from objective, and are not agreed upon, in consequence of the widened scope of psychoanalysis. A good many analysts find it appropriate to apply the analytic method per se to borderline or even frankly psychotic conditions; while others would disagree that analysis in such cases is classical or that it could really be psychoanalysis, per se. And Kuiper feels that in consequence of this dilution of analysis, we might lose our main instrument, our basic psychoanalytic method, with its systematic standardization by means of which it gains reliability as a scientific investigatory procedure. Furthermore, we might find, without being aware, that we have lost this method which is so specific for the treatment of the transference neurosis, not for the "so-called good case for analysis", as Zetzel puts it, but for the really appropriate case in which the "standard" systematic psychoanalytic procedure is really appropriate.

The danger, of which there is substantial evidence, is that students are then not properly trained in psychoanalysis, and fail adequately to distinguish one type of illness from another, much less to become really competent in applying analysis when the conditions are right for it.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.