Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lorenzer, A. (1968). Some Observations on the Latency of Symptoms in Patients Suffering from Persecution Sequelae. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49:316-318.

(1968). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49:316-318

Some Observations on the Latency of Symptoms in Patients Suffering from Persecution Sequelae

Alfred Lorenzer

In the present symposium a special phenomenon has been mentioned, namely that of latency of symptoms. This is an obscure but important problem on which I wish to comment. What I have to contribute are some observations my colleagues and I made on the so-called symptom-free interval. I wish, however, to mention that these experiences were not in the first place made with concentration camp victims but with patients suffering from traumatic neuroses caused by incomparably milder traumatizations. The reason why I present these cases as models which might facilitate the understanding of cases of symptom latency occurring with concentration camp victims, is the following. Glover, commenting on the specific kind of inaccessibility encountered in severe traumatic neuroses, recommended an approach by way of comparable but less severe cases. He expected that in the milder forms some factors might be elicited which would also apply to the severer processes. The more urgent the defence, the more impenetrable the warding-off mechanisms. I think that our observations are likely to prove the validity of Glover's recommendation.

The patients we saw had suffered severe bodily traumata during war, either loss of eyesight or of limbs. In striking contrast to the usual course of such injuries, our patients showed no emotional reactions to their mutilations. Pain and operations were stoically endured and overcome with the help of a great display of activity. The injuries and the consequences thereof "did not mean anything" to them; psychologically speaking, the reality was put aside by an act of "denial of affect".

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.