Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: You can request more content in your language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language? We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Arlow, J.A. Freud, A. Lampl-De Groot, J. Beres, D. (1968). Panel Discussion. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49:506-512.

(1968). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49:506-512

Panel Discussion

Jacob A. Arlow, Anna Freud, Jeanne Lampl-De Groot and David Beres

Dr Arlow (Moderator): When I was thinking of how to introduce this Panel it occurred to me to say that it was the intention of the Programme Committee that after the colleagues of the convention had worked so hard and so long on different problems they would like to relax and have other questions and problems placed before a panel of our leading colleagues. I was going to compare it with a dessert at the end of a meal, to introduce some touch of humour; however, I am in no position to do so because our hardworking colleagues have not given up their determination to work out the problems with which they have been grappling all week. About half the questions that have been sent up to me concern the very topics around which we assembled originally, namely the Pre-Congress meeting on selection of candidates for training, and the main theme of the Congress, acting out. In addition, a few of the subsidiary panels which took place during this week have occasioned additional questions. I have had to make a selection and I hope that the members of the audience who submitted questions will not be disappointed if some of them are not brought before the Panel. Also it has been necessary for me to combine a number of the questions. Accordingly if your question is not asked in the precise form in which you presented it the fault is mine and I beg your indulgence.

Our first question is one of definition, and a good point of departure, I believe: How do you understand the concept of object constancy, and at what stage in the development of the child does this become a persistent quality of the child's mental functioning?

Miss Freud: How do we understand the concept of object constancy? May I say that this is a question for which I am quite well prepared because every visitor who has recently come to our Hampstead Clinic has asked it.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.