Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rosen, V.H. (1969). Introduction to Panel on Language and Psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50:113-116.

(1969). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50:113-116

Introduction to Panel on Language and Psychoanalysis

Victor H. Rosen

Ferdinand de Saussure (1916), who is called the father of modern linguistics, is also the father of a distinguished psychoanalyst, Dr Raymond de Saussure, but there are other important ties between the two disciplines. Psychoanalysis cannot do without language, and the study of language cannot dispense with psychology. Psychoanalysis has contributed important insights into the psychopathology of language (for an excellent account of this and a good bibliography on the subject see Laffal (1965)). The study of the structure of language, on the other hand, promises to provide us with some important glimpses into basic patterns of the organization of the ego (Chomsky, 1957); (Edelheit, 1968); (Freud, 1888), (1895); (Luria, 1961); (Miller and Isard, 1963); (Vernon, 1967); (Vygotsky, 1962); (Werner and Kaplan, 1963); (Whorf, 1962).

Linguistics and psychoanalysis also share several methodological similarities. Both are based upon deterministic assumptions. They place a similar emphasis on historical development and both depend heavily upon the reconstruction of the past as an important tool. Both fields are analytic in their approach. Clinical theory and the study of the structure of specific languages afford interesting similarities, while even more striking in their analogous relationship are the metapsychology of psychoanalysis and the "metalinguistic" systems for the study of language (e.g. the transformational grammar of Chomsky (1957)).

The relationship of language to thought is central to both disciplines and continues to preoccupy linguists directly and psychoanalysts by implication in all of their activities.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.