Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hill, D. (1971). On the Contributions of Psychoanalysis to Psychiatry: Mechanism and Meaning. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 52:1-10.

(1971). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 52:1-10

On the Contributions of Psychoanalysis to Psychiatry: Mechanism and Meaning

Denis Hill

The choice of a psychiatrist to give the Ernest Jones Lecture is a precedent of which I am deeply appreciative. While psychoanalysis has by common consent exercised a powerful influence in every field of human activity where man's relationship with man is at issue, it owes its origins to medicine and its main practical endeavour has always been to alleviate individual suffering, an aim which it shares with medicine and psychiatry. Yet the history of the relationships between our two disciplines has not been an easy or a happy one. I therefore count it a great honour that I should have been invited to give this lecture. When I set my mind to preparing it, I became increasingly aware of the difficulty of the task and of the heavy responsibility which I had undertaken. The choice of my title 'The Contributions of Psychoanalysis to Psychiatry' reflects my view that they have been great, but with Ernest Jones (1956) I do not believe that we can yet assess how great, nor can we foretell what the future will hold. I do not therefore propose to attempt a historical reconstruction of past events for others well qualified have done so, and notably of course Ernest Jones himself.

Rather I wish to consider some of the difficulties which appear to me to have stood in the way of the integration of our two disciplines. Some of these are of a theoretical, some of a practical nature; I propose to take only the first, and then only a part of it—for the subject is vast. It is always unwise to predict the future.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.