Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return from a journal’s Table of Contents to the Table of Volumes…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can return with one click from a journal’s Table of Contents (TOC) to the Table of Volumes simply by clicking on “Volume n” at the top of the TOC (where n is the volume number).

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Roland, A. (1971). The Context and Unique Function of Dreams in Psychoanalytic Therapy: Clinical Approach. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 52:431-439.

(1971). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 52:431-439

The Context and Unique Function of Dreams in Psychoanalytic Therapy: Clinical Approach

Alan Roland

I

From close scrutiny of the dream literature and working with dreams in psychoanalytic therapy, the problem of the context in which dreams are reported in psychoanalysis and the function they serve in the ongoing therapy seem to us to need important amplification. While the clinical approach to dreams expressed in this paper is obviously practised by some analysts, it has not to our knowledge been given a sound enough theoretical basis or been described sufficiently in the dream literature. By clarification and elaboration of the context and the bases for the unique function of dreams, we hope to contribute towards a better conceptualized approach in working with dreams in psychoanalytic therapy.

Such an approach has added relevance today because of an increasing controversy over the place of the dream in psychoanalysis. One school of thought (Arlow & Brenner, 1964); (Waldhorn, 1967) diminishes the importance of dreams, designating them on the same order of psychic value as the various other means of communication in psychoanalysis, such as free associations, fantasy, transference phenomena and so forth. As reported by Altman (1969), this down-grading of the dream seems to have gained a widespread hearing today in many American psychoanalytic training institutes. Another school of thought (Kanzer, 1955); (Bergmann, 1966); (Klauber, 1967) opts for the uniqueness of the dream, not so much because of its being the royal road to the unconscious, but rather because of its communicative function in the ongoing therapy.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.