Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Heimann, P. (1974). A Discussion of the Paper by Charles Brenner on 'Depression, Anxiety and Affect Theory'. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 55:33-36.

(1974). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 55:33-36

A Discussion of the Paper by Charles Brenner on 'Depression, Anxiety and Affect Theory' Related Papers

Paula Heimann

In his revision of psychoanalytic theory (Brenner, 1953); (Arlow & Brenner, 1964) Brenner turns his attention to a highly important area.

To start with depression: Brenner (this issue) challenges the view that depression is a diagnostic category, an illness per se, and, with a series of arguments, proposes to regard it only as a configuration of symptoms which may originate at any period of development, but do so most frequently at the phallic–oedipal stage.

He challenges those who hold that depression is an illness to produce proof for their view.

I do not claim to produce such proof. But, agreeing with Brenner that clinical observation alone should guide our theories, I shall present some clinical material, a diagnostic interview, to show why I am sure that depression is an illness, while remaining unsure sometimes whether in a given case this illness will prove to be neurotic or psychotic, or a phase in a schizophrenic patient. (For a careful exploration of the differential diagnosis between depression and schizophrenia, see Jacobson, 1971.)

A few words about the difference between symptoms and illness, although I am restating what is familiar.

One of Freud's major contributions to psychology lies in his discovery that the frontiers between mental health and illness are not as hard and fast as was thought at his time. However, this understanding of psychic life does not demolish the concept of psychic illness.

We are all prone at times to be depressed or manic ('basic ego states': Lewin, 1965); (Bibring, 1953); (Mahler, 1969, and others), to react in a paranoid fashion, have a delusional idea or a hallucination, stay rooted to the spot, lost in nothingness, etc.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.