Abrams, S. (1974). A Discussion of the Paper by Joseph Sandler on 'Psychological Conflict an... Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 55:63-66.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1974). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 55:63-66

A Discussion of the Paper by Joseph Sandler on 'Psychological Conflict and the Structural Model: Some Clinical and Theoretical Implications' Related Papers


Samuel Abrams Author Information

Dr Sandler (this issue) reminds us of the following fact: in the course of all psychoanalyses, a wide variety of unconscious— descriptively unconscious—urgent feelings and ideas become accessible. Some of these imperatives obviously derive their valence from instinctual drives, implemented, for example, through the infantile sexual function. But other imperatives seem more remote from the drives; imperative defences, or affects or infantile adaptive modes.

From these empirical observations, Dr Sandler goes on to suggest additions to our conceptual framework. He notes that the structural theory tends to emphasize intersystemic conflicts, especially the ego-id one, so much so that intra -systemic conflicts are likely to be by-passed. And he reminds us that intrasystemic conflicts consume a considerable portion of our work. Hence he recommends that we consider this conceptual addition: a regrouping of the function of the total mental apparatus according to 'u

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.