Ornstein, P.H. (1974). A Discussion of the Paper by Otto F. Kernberg on 'Further Contribut... Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 55:241-247.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1974). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 55:241-247

A Discussion of the Paper by Otto F. Kernberg on 'Further Contributions to the Treatment of Narcissistic Personalities' Related Papers


Paul H. Ornstein Author Information

It was a pleasure to study the full-length version (this issue) of Dr Kernberg's rich and articulate exposition and to have read his own summary of it in the form in which we just heard him deliver it.

In this paper Kernberg has undertaken to summarize and further elaborate his ideas about narcissistic personalities, especially those that relate to the role of the aggressive drives and their derivatives in narcissistic disorders. He has done this by juxtaposing some of the key elements in his own theory and technique to those of Heinz Kohut, and by giving us a comparative evaluation of the two points of view, stressing agreements and disagreements wherever he sees them. This approach undoubtedly enlivens the current debate and I welcome the challenge it presents for an ongoing, reasoned scientific dialogue.

Kernberg's thoughtful paper does deserve a full, point by point consideration, but on this occasion time only permits (1) some general remarks, (2) the choice of a few spe

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.