Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see author affiliation information in an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see author affiliation and contact information (as available) in an article, simply click on the Information icon next to the author’s name in every journal article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Calder, K.T. (1976). Discussion of the Paper by David Liberman on 'Changes in the Theory and Practice of Psychoanalysis'. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 57:109-111.

(1976). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 57:109-111

Discussion of the Paper by David Liberman on 'Changes in the Theory and Practice of Psychoanalysis'

Kenneth T. Calder

Although it is tempting to discuss Dr Liberman's paper (this issue) point-by-point as he presents his ideas, I believe it will be more useful if I follow an organization somewhat different from his but with a clear intent to discuss most if not all of the issues he describes. It is my aim to focus on what I consider Dr Liberman's most important topic: what is essential in psychoanalysis that we wish to preserve in spite of changes in society or patient population and/or advances in psychoanalytic theory and technique.

I share with Wallerstein (1969) the view that psychoanalysis is the method 'which analyses transference and resistance back to their genetic-dynamic roots in the infantile psychic life'. The primary aim of the psychoanalytic process is for the analysand to learn how his mind functions and how it came to function that way. To achieve this aim, it is essential that the patient accomplish several analytic objectives (or perhaps 'assignments' or 'tasks'). My discussion of Liberman's paper will be organized around four essential objectives: motivation, free association, insight and change.

First, the patient has to be motivated to learn about himself or herself. Ideally the patient suffers from his emotional problems and, because of pain, is willing to explore his inner life to the fullest in the strong anticipation that his suffering will be relieved through understanding. Liberman reports that, unfortunately, 'the bulk of patients' now come with a weak motivation; namely, they are 'quasi-colleagues' who want to be analysed, at least in large measure, for narcissistic gain or as an education by means of which they can function better in their profession.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.