Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search only within a publication time period…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for articles in a specific time period? You can refine your search by using the Year feature in the Search Section. This tool could be useful for studying the impact of historical events on psychoanalytic theories.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kuiper, P.C. (1976). A Discussion of the Paper by Edgar L. Lipton on 'Psychoanalytic Child Development Research and the Practice of General Psychiatry'. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 57:125-126.

(1976). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 57:125-126

A Discussion of the Paper by Edgar L. Lipton on 'Psychoanalytic Child Development Research and the Practice of General Psychiatry'

P. C. Kuiper

It is my pleasure to comply with the request of the Programme Committee by making a few comments about Dr Lipton's methodical and lucid lecture (this issue). Since there are no points with which I fundamentally disagree I would like to formulate a few thoughts which arose while reading his discourse, particularly with reference to points 1 and 2.

The subject of maternal deprivation remains an important one. By and large there seems to be an increasing tendency for neurotic tension to be discharged either in addiction or in that which we commonly refer to as psychopathic behaviour; destructive aggression to be specific. People tend to take two directions when trying to escape inner conflicts and the corresponding painful emotions: acting out of tensions and addiction, one of the greatest and most difficult problems in modern clinical psychiatry.

Two personality traits visible in all individuals with a predisposition to these forms of escape are: low frustration-tolerance and poor impulse-regulation. We do know that a warm relationship between a mother and child is a necessary condition for the development of effective impulse-regulation and frustration-tolerance, although it is, of course, more complicated.

A lack of security and impossibility to identify with parents who have a more or less structured superego and ego ideal make it impossible for many children to learn to cope with disappointments, to bear the grief inherent in each frustration and what is probably more essential, to conquer the grandiose fantasies that so often serve as a solution to frustration yet simultaneously increase the child's vulnerability.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.