Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see definitions for highlighted words…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Some important words in PEP Web articles are highlighted when you place your mouse pointer over them. Clicking on the words will display a definition from a psychoanalytic dictionary in a small window.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lipton, S.D. (1977). The Advantages of Freud's Technique as Shown in his Analysis of the Rat Man. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 58:255-273.

(1977). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 58:255-273

The Advantages of Freud's Technique as Shown in his Analysis of the Rat Man

Samuel D. Lipton

While psychoanalytic technique is often considered uniform or standardized, there are actually many areas of disagreement. These disagreements are more concealed or glossed over than revealed in the literature, but I assume that other analysts, like me, have learned about them in discussions with colleagues and from the reports of patients who have been treated by other analysts. The fact that these disagreements exist and the complicating fact that they are not documented plainly makes it impossible to reach general conclusions about technique. In my opinion what is referred to as standard technique may be considered a trend, perhaps a dominant trend, and in what I designate as modern technique I mean no more than that. It is only for clarity in exposition that henceforward I shall refer to Freud's technique and modern techniques as if there were a sharp, uniform distinction. I shall attempt to distinguish the two techniques and to point out the advantages of Freud's technique over modern technique.

While the issue I am discussing is broader than can be subsumed under the discussion of a single case, I shall base an important part of my argument on Freud's technique in his analysis of the Rat Man (Freud, 1909) mainly because by that means I can document a number of points. I shall defend the argument that Freud's technique in that case was his definitive technique and point out how it differs from modern technique. Then I shall describe the difference further with information I have learned in discussions with colleagues which is not in the literature.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.