Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rangell, L. (1978). On Understanding and Treating Anxiety and its Derivatives. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 59:229-236.

(1978). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59:229-236

On Understanding and Treating Anxiety and its Derivatives

Leo Rangell

In moving from the discussion of a general theory of affects to focusing on the specific affect of anxiety, we are turning to the affect which, in conjunction with Freud's (1926) classic monograph on the problem of anxiety and even in the decades before that although in a more ambiguous way, has been traditionally considered the nucleus of the neurosis. 'A nodal point', to quote Freud (1917), 'the fundamental phenomenon and main problem of neurosis' (Freud, 1926). At the last Congress in London, on what has and what has not changed in psychoanalysis, I suggested (Rangell, 1975) that this is still the case.

An expansion of anxiety theory—anxiety and other affects of unpleasure

I should like to start this discussion by reaffirming this point of view. At this Congress, however, devoted to a study of affects, I wish to fortify this assertion by adding a theoretical perspective on the relationship of anxiety to other affects of unpleasure which also play a role in pathogenesis. A number of recent contributions, both to the theories of affect and anxiety, have pointed out that signal anxiety should be expanded to include signal affect in general (Schur, 1967); (Klein, 1972); (Rangell, 1973) and that the role of affects in conflict and psychopathology should be widened to include the spectrum of unpleasure rather than anxiety alone (Brenner, 1975). In spite of these expansions of clinical theory, none of these additions to the understanding of clinical phenomena should, in my opinion, be allowed to crowd out the special role of anxiety in the intrapsychic series of events leading to defence and subsequent neurosis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.