Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Widlöcher, D. (1978). The Ego Ideal of the Psychoanalyst. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 59:387-390.

(1978). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59:387-390

The Ego Ideal of the Psychoanalyst

Daniel Widlöcher

We must examine the issues which lead us to become interested in the psychoanalyst's ego ideal. Is it simply a matter of applying to ourselves the sort of questions which could be extended to any other profession? Or is it a matter of thinking together about an aspect of our mental functioning which is particularly involved in our professional activity? The second hypothesis is the more likely, and there is every reason to believe that there is an area specific to the analyst's ego ideal, arising from the fact that he carries out his professional activity after a personal experience of psychoanalysis, and especially from the particular conditions of analytic practice.

The analyst's ego ideal in the analytic situation

An important part of the ego ideal is involved in all professional activity. Because of the conditions of the analyst's practice, his professional isolation and the problem of knowing the results of his work, this part of the ego ideal receives little in the way of narcissistic gratification. Nowadays we talk freely of the power of the analyst. We recognize less often the lack of means he has to measure the effect of this power. What does he know of his capacity to be a good analyst, an analyst who is as good as he can be for each and every one of his patients? These questions are rarely asked openly, and yet they are familiar to all those who are starting out as analysts, the more so because they are an extension of questions about the success of their personal analysis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.