Login
Kohon, G. (1984). Reflections on Dora: The Case of Hysteria. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 65:73-84.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1984). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 65:73-84

Reflections on Dora: The Case of Hysteria

Gregorio Kohon Author Information

I

Freud in 1886, in his 'Report from Paris' (Freud, 1886a) —the first paper in the English Standard Edition of his complete works—separates hysteria as a psychic illness from biological sex. This is what he has learnt from Charcot in Paris, he tells us, and to which he adds the notion of hysteria as caused by a psychic trauma which occurred at some point in the past history of the subject. In the same way that they were formerly treated as witches, nowadays—says Freud—female hysterical patients can easily be identified as 'liars', women who 'deceive us'. In the discussion that followed the presentation of this report to the College of Professors of the Faculty of Medicine in Vienna (Andersson, 1962), it was suggested that Freud should present the case of a male hysteric, which in fact he does a few months later (Freud, 1886b). This last lecture becomes his first published paper on hysteria.

By including men among hysterical patients, Freud joins in the attempt to give scientific status to the proposition of hysteria as a psychiatric diagnosis. Nevertheless, despite this separation between hysteria and biological sex the cases of hysteria in women form the entire contribution to the 'Studies in hysteria' (Freud, 1893/95). Psychoanalysis truly began with women. As it will be suggested in the third part of this paper, the connexion between women and hysteria makes sense to me, and Freud never seemed to have abandoned this idea which in fact has

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.