Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To open articles without exiting the current webpage…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To open articles without exiting your current search or webpage, press Ctrl + Left Mouse Button while hovering over the desired link. It will open in a new Tab in your internet browser.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

De Saussure, J. (1993). To be or not to be a Patient. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 74:181.

(1993). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74:181

To be or not to be a Patient

Janice De Saussure

Mme de Saussure writes:

Thank you for your letter informing me of the comment Mr Torp made about my use of the word patient in my talk given at the University of Copenhagen last Winter. As he told you, he made the same point during the discussion there. I can only say, as I did at the time, that for me what counts most is the basic attitude of respect the analyst has for the person in analysis. I do not think that one can jump to the conclusion that use of the word patient is adequate proof that the analyst looks down on or belittles the person in analysis nor that using the word analysand or client necessarily means respect. I did point out that the word chosen is related to the customs and usage in different parts of the world. Undoubtedly the meaning attributed to each term used to designate a person in analysis varies according to the point of view of the person using it or the one hearing it.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.