Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Jacobs, T.J. (1993). Response. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 74:1140-1145.
    

(1993). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74:1140-1145

Response

Theodore J. Jacobs

I am pleased to have the opportunity to respond to these two most interesting and challenging discussions, and I thank Drs Green and Wender for undertaking the task of discussing my paper.

I will begin with Dr Green's remarks.

I should say, firstly, that in accepting Dr Tyson's kind invitation to submit a paper for this Congress, I understood my task to be one of describing certain experiences I had had in sessions, as a way of contributing to the intriguing question that concerns us here: what takes place in the mind of the analyst between listening and interpretation? I had no thought of presenting a full account of an analytic case, making a statement about how analysis should be conducted, or defending a particular theory or technique. Nor was it my purpose to write a scholarly paper replete with references (for which omission Dr Green has taken me to task). I wished simply to share the thoughts and fantasies that arose in my mind during one hour as a springboard for discussion of the topic of this meeting.

I was surprised, then, not only by the tone of Dr Green's remarks but by the substance of his discussion. On the slightest of evidence he undertakes a searching criticism, not only of the analytic hour that I presented, but of my overall analytic approach.

I find myself, therefore, in the unexpected, and decidedly uncomfortable, position of having to defend, not only my work with Mr V in the session that I described, but my way of thinking and functioning as an analyst.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.