Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kite, J.V. (1993). Projective and Introjective Identification and the Use of the Therapist's Self: By Jill Savege Scharff. New Jersey and London: Jason Aronson. 1993. Pp. 340.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 74:1301-1302.

(1993). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74:1301-1302

Projective and Introjective Identification and the Use of the Therapist's Self: By Jill Savege Scharff. New Jersey and London: Jason Aronson. 1993. Pp. 340.

Review by:
Jane V. Kite

Starting with Melanie Klein, theories of projective identification and the related concepts of introjection, incorporation, and identification have had an essential but elusive place in psychoanalytic thinking and clinical practice. Typically, these concepts have been applied almost exclusively to the patient. Jill Scharff's stated aim in this book is to demystify projective and introjective processes in general, and in particular to elucidate their role in the therapist's countertransference. She seeks to clarify the operation of empathy and intuition in the therapist's clinical reasoning, building a theory of therapeutic action that rests on unconscious introjective and projective identificatory processes in the mind of the therapist/analyst. This is a fascinating but tall order, which I believe Dr Scharff fulfils only in part.

The most successful aspect of the book is a superb review of the literature on projective identification, including a lucid tour through the confusions and reversals in definitions and terminology since (and including) Klein. Unlike other authors on the subject, Scharff lauds the excessive conceptual play in the uses of projection and projective identification as essential to the on-going creative potential in a theoretically and clinically useful but essentially ambiguous idea. In going on to develop her argument for the role of projection and introjection in the countertransference, Scharff makes an argument for projective identification as a 'two-body' (intersubjective) phenomenon, adding the comparatively forgotten concept of introjective identification as the bridge to the therapist's countertransference response.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.