You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.
You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Steiner, R. (1995). Hermeneutics Or Hermes-Mess?. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 76:435-445.
(1995). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76:435-445
Hermeneutics Or Hermes-Mess?
I have been asked to consider some aspects of the present state of the link between psychoanalysis and hermeneutics, to do so succinctly and to express my personal view. This is as well, since the task of condensing into a few paragraphs what is in fact a large portion of Western thought with a substantial literature, mainly in German, dating back four or five hundred years, would be quite beyond me. Even a review of the main strands in the work of psychoanalysts such as Thomä, Kaechele, Schafer and Spence, among many others, and their use of the hermeneutical tradition in the work of Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, Gadamer, Habermas, Ricoeur and others, is much beyond my scope (Steiner, 1992). Instead I shall concentrate on a few of what I think are now the core issues.
Sources and context
First, drawing on an unpublished paper (Steiner, 1992), I want to raise the question of the use of sources and the implications of applying ideas developed in one context in one discipline to the understanding of another context in another discipline, as for example in the application of hermeneutics to psychoanalysis in the work of Schafer (1978, 1983, 1993) and Spence (1982, 1987, 1994).
Inevitably, when selecting ideas from one field, it is difficult to be completely aware of the context in which those ideas have been developed or of the context in which one's own ideas will later be used. Bearing in mind the debate that is going on in psychoanalysis concerning hermeneutics, particularly in America, therefore, it is significant to note that none of the major contributors have yet been aware of a very important debate which took place between Gadamer and Habermas (1973) on the very subject of psychoanalysis itself, then available only in German (Warnke, 1987).
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]