Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Levine, H.B. (1995). Posttraumatic Nightmares: Psychodynamic Explorations. : By Melvin R. Lansky with Carol R. Bley. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. 1995. Pp. 188.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 76:1279-1281.

(1995). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76:1279-1281

Posttraumatic Nightmares: Psychodynamic Explorations. : By Melvin R. Lansky with Carol R. Bley. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. 1995. Pp. 188.

Review by:
Howard B. Levine

This book challenges a long-neglected contradiction embedded in the psychoanalytic theory of dreams. On the one hand, Freud's (1900) original model held that the manifest content of the dream was a defensive screen for latent dream thoughts linked to conflicts surrounding unfulfilled, unconscious, infantile wishes. The press of these wishes for gratification and discharge was intensified by the events of the day (the day residue) and opposed by the defensive operations of the ego (the dream work). A conflict ensued, which Freud believed had the potential to disturb the dreamer's sleep, unless it was resolved by a form of compromise: forbidden wishes would be represented in the manifest content of the dream, but only if they were disguised by the mechanisms of the primary processcondensation, displacement and symbolisation. Thus, Freud proposed that the manifest dream was a defensive distortion of the ‘true’ (latent) dream thoughts that lay beneath it and that the dream was the guardian of sleep.

Twenty years later, however, in considering repetitive dreams that occurred following trauma, Freud (1920) concluded that their manifest contents were more or less accurate accounts of actual events, which were being dreamt in an attempt to master trauma. In this second dream theory, Freud excepted the post-traumatic dream from the rule that the instigation and raison d’être of the dream was the gratification of unconscious infantile wishes and the protection of the dreamer's need to sleep. He also conceptually freed the manifest content of such dreams from the assumption that it was a disguised, multiply-determined representation of unconscious, conflicted infantile wishes. Thus, Freud viewed the structure and function of the post-traumatic nightmare as being more like an affectively charged memory than a ‘true’ dream.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.