Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tous, J.M. (1996). Panel Report: Hysteria One Hundred Years On: Chaired by EDWARD NERSESSIAN, New York. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 77:75-78.
  

(1996). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77:75-78

Panel Report: Hysteria One Hundred Years On: Chaired by EDWARD NERSESSIAN, New York

Joana M. Tous

The Chairman opened the proceedings by asking two questions: (1) had hysteria disappeared or did we simply not know how to diagnose it, and (2) what in our view were the factors that predisposed to hysteria?

On diagnosis, the first panellist, Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel, pointed out that Freud had stated already in the Studies on Hysteria that the term hysteria could cover the worst and the most contradictory of phenomena. Pure forms were very hard to find in the clinical situation; mixed configurations made up of an amalgam of symptoms were the most common, so that diagnosis was difficult.

Hysteria had often been explained and treated as a severe narcissistic pathology calling for the working through of archaic nuclei of the patient's psyche. Many authors of the British school, such as Rosenfeld and Brenman, considered that powerful psychotic anxieties underlay hysteria. Other authors, such as Kernberg, placed hysterical personalities in the borderline category. By contrast, representatives of the French school, such as Green and Laplanche, distrusted and were concerned about the desexualisation of psychoanalysis.

The diagnosis of hysteria was impeded by the fragmentation of psychic structures, the lack of repression and the incompleteness of the oedipal organisation, which meant that hysterics were often seen as borderline personalities.

For this contributor, the hysterical nucleus lay in neurosis, psychosis or a borderline state according to the relevant level of regression.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.