Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Steiner, J. (1997). Letter. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 78:583.

(1997). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78:583

Letter

John Steiner

Dear Sir,

Thank you for showing me the letter from Dr Joseph Schachter, which begins with a couple of comments on my paper. My comment about the usefulness or not of theory was not meant in the way he takes it.

I agree that a theory should be clinically useful. It can help the analyst to think about sessions, to understand what he believes might have been going on, to communicate with colleagues and to serve as a background orientation to help understand the patient. I am suggesting that it is not much use when we are actually in a session where it may in fact function as a defence against understanding and where it is more important to open ourselves to the communication from the patient. Between sessions a good theory can be very helpful and important and if it is clear and well understood it can more easily become a background orientation rather than intrude consciously in the course of a session.

Dr Schachter’s further points seem to me to be an attempt to make analysis impervious to attacks from what he calls ‘widespread destructive criticism’. I fear that such attempts will never satisfy desructive critics and that they impoverish much of what we believe to be most valuable in the psychoanalytic method.

Yours

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.