Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Cavell, M. Davidson, D. (1997). Review of The Psychoanalytic Mind: from Freud to Philosophy. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 78:1017-1018.

(1997). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78:1017-1018

Review of The Psychoanalytic Mind: from Freud to Philosophy

Marcia Cavell and Donald Davidson

Dear Sir

I write in response to Allan D. Rosenblatt’s review of my book The Psychoanalytic Mind, from Freud to Philosophy (Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 188-193). There is certainly room for disagreement about many of my contentions in that book, but Mr Rosenblatt attributes to me several positions that are simply not mine. Disagreement is one thing; talking past the other, another. Since I know my book can be rough reading, I hope here to make a little clearer what some of the issues are with which my readers might disagree.

1) Rosenblatt asserts that I revive ‘the long discredited “doctrine of immaculate perception’”. What I do claim is that it is a requirement of interpretation—whether the interpreter is psychoanalyst, anthropologist, or friend with friend—that the interpreter take some of the other’s reports to be true. (A good part of the longest chapter of my book—Chapter One—is devoted to a discussion of this idea and to the concept of truth at its heart. There I discuss also the considerations that have led people to identify truth with correspondence or with coherence, and I say why I think both views say something partially right and partially wrong.) This is a long way from any doctrine of ‘immaculate perception’.

2) He ignores my distinction in the chapter on emotions (Chapter Seven) between affects and emotions, and my explicit thesis that there is a continuum from affects, which

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.