Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Evernote for note taking…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Evernote  is a general note taking application that integrates with your browser.  You can use it to save entire articles, bookmark articles, take notes, and more. It comes in both a free version which has limited synchronization capabilities, and also a subscription version, which raises that limit. You can download Evernote for your computer here. It can be used online, and there’s an app for it as well.

Some of the things you can do with Evernote:

  • Save search-result lists
  • Save complete articles
  • Save bookmarks to articles


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Cavell, M., Davidson, D. (1997). Review of The Psychoanalytic Mind: from Freud to Philosophy. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 78:1017-1018.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.


Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1997). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78:1017-1018

Review of The Psychoanalytic Mind: from Freud to Philosophy

Marcia Cavell and Donald Davidson

Dear Sir

I write in response to Allan D. Rosenblatt’s review of my book The Psychoanalytic Mind, from Freud to Philosophy (Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 188-193). There is certainly room for disagreement about many of my contentions in that book, but Mr Rosenblatt attributes to me several positions that are simply not mine. Disagreement is one thing; talking past the other, another. Since I know my book can be rough reading, I hope here to make a little clearer what some of the issues are with which my readers might disagree.

1) Rosenblatt asserts that I revive ‘the long discredited “doctrine of immaculate perception’”. What I do claim is that it is a requirement of interpretation—whether the interpreter is psychoanalyst, anthropologist, or friend with friend—that the interpreter take some of the other’s reports to be true. (A good part of the longest chapter of my book—Chapter One—is devoted to a discussion of this idea and to the concept of truth at its heart. There I discuss also the considerations that have led people to identify truth with correspondence or with coherence, and I say why I think both views say something partially right and partially wrong.) This is a long way from any doctrine of ‘immaculate perception’.

2) He ignores my distinction in the chapter on emotions (Chapter Seven) between affects and emotions, and my explicit thesis that there is a continuum from affects, which

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.