Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search only within a publication time period…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for articles in a specific time period? You can refine your search by using the Year feature in the Search Section. This tool could be useful for studying the impact of historical events on psychoanalytic theories.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Widlöcher, D. (1998). Quality Control, Condensed Analysis and Ethics. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 79:1-11.
    

(1998). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79:1-11

Quality Control, Condensed Analysis and Ethics

Daniel Widlöcher

A doctor who once had an exciting and fruitful analysis with a ‘master’ of the time decides for personal reasons to embark upon another treatment many years later. This second analysis profoundly disappoints him. The quality of the exchanges seems to him to fall far short of what he had experienced before. The analyst appears absent-minded and bored as he listens, and his interventions are off the point. Nothing happens and the patient decides to break off the analysis after three years of regular sessions. He then goes to a third analyst, whose way of practising analysis is very different from that of the second. Substantial and fruitful psychic work is accomplished. Now the practice of the second analyst has proved incorrect in terms both of his behaviour in the sessions and of his interventions. In any other medical speciality, this negligence or incompetence would be common knowledge and would result in a loss of reputation or even a sanction. So the patient wonders what approach psychoanalytic organisations have towards monitoring the quality of the care provided by practitioners trained at their institutes and claiming adherence to the methods espoused in their soceties.

Why Evaluate?

This issue of the quality of care cannot be evaded for much longer. It is the patients themselves (the ‘consumers’) who are concerned about it, anticipated or followed by government and, more generally, by public opinion as a whole.

The insistence on the need for evaluation and quality control of psychoanalytic treatment is relatively recent (Chodoff, 1996).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.