Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Renik, O. (1999). Renik replies to Cavell. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 80(2):382-383.

(1999). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 80(2):382-383

Renik replies to Cavell

Owen Renik

Dear Sir,

I'm delighted to have the opportunity to briefly respond to Marcia Cavell's critique (int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 1195–1202) of my article, ‘The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity’ (Int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 487-497). I think we should begin with the report of her own clinical work that Marcia offers us, because it illustrates what happens when her point of view about truth, reality and the analyst's position in relation to them holds sway in the treatment situation. Marcia writes: ‘A patient of mine had suddenly begun to annoy me quite a lot. I was worried about the intensity of my annoyance. No question that the patient was, though unconsciously, out to annoy me…’ (p. 1198).

No question? I would say, rather, that there's always a question when one person judges unconscious motivation on the part of another. Marcia has transformed her inference, with all its personal determinants, into an indisputable fact of observation.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.