Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Holmes, J. (2000). Memory and therapeutic action. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 81(2):353-354.

(2000). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81(2):353-354

Memory and therapeutic action

Jeremy Holmes

Dear Sir,

Peter Fonagy's Guest Editorial (‘Memory and therapeutic action’, Int. J. Psychoanal., 80:215-23) compellingly links the psychoanalytic tradition, current attachment literature, and cognitive ideas on the psychology of memory. From an attachment perspective it can be extended in a number of ways.

First, while the distinction between declarative and implicit memory is crucial, it is also important to consider what might be the relationship between these two memory systems. Attachment research suggests that secure and insecure developmental pathways tend to be relatively stable, so that children diagnosed as insecure in infancy will be similarly classified at school entry and subsequently. The mechanisms maintaining this stability are only just beginning to be discovered, but it presumably depends on consistent parent-child dyads in which each evokes a particular set of secure-or insecure-making responses from the other.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.