Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To find a specific quote…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Trying to find a specific quote? Go to the Search section, and write it using quotation marks in “Search for Words or Phrases in Context.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Seganti, A. Carnevale, G. Mucelli, R. Solano, L. Target, M. (2000). From Sixty-Two Interviews On ‘The Worst And The Best Episode Of Your Life’ Relationships Between Internal Working Models And A Grammatical Scale Of Subject-Object Affective Connections. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 81(3):529-551.
  

(2000). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81(3):529-551

From Sixty-Two Interviews On ‘The Worst And The Best Episode Of Your Life’ Relationships Between Internal Working Models And A Grammatical Scale Of Subject-Object Affective Connections

Andrea Seganti, Giorgio Carnevale, Roberto Mucelli, Luigi Solano and Mary Target

The authors address the issue of inferring unconscious internal working models of interaction through language. After reviewing Main's seminal work of linguistic assessment through the ‘adult attachment interview’, they stress the idea of adults' internal working models (IWMs) as information-processing devices, which give moment-to-moment sensory orientation in the face of any past or present, animate or inanimate object. They propose that a selective perception of the objects could match expected with actual influence of objects on the subject's self, through very simple ‘parallel-processed’ categories of internal objects. They further hypothesise that the isomorphism between internal working models of interaction and grammatical connections between subjects and objects within a clause could be a key to tracking positive and negative images of self and other during discourse. An experiment is reported applying the authors' ‘scale of subject/object affective connection’ to the narratives of sixty-two subjects asked to write about the ‘worst’ and ‘best’ episodes of their lives. Participants had previously been classified using Hazan & Shaver's self-reported ‘attachment types’ (avoidant, anxious and secure) categorising individuals' general expectations in relation to others. The findings were that the subject/object distribution of positive and negative experience, through verbs defined for this purpose as either performative or state verbs, did significantly differ between groups. In addition, different groups tended, during the best episodes, significantly to invert the trend of positive/negative subject/object distribution shown during the worst episode. Results are discussed in terms of a psychoanalytic theory of improvement through co-operative elaboration of negative relational issues.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.