Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kächele, H. Thomä, H. (2000). On the devaluation of the Eitingon-Freud model of psychoanalytic education. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 81(4):806-808.

(2000). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81(4):806-808

On the devaluation of the Eitingon-Freud model of psychoanalytic education

Horst Kächele and Helmut Thomä

Dear Sir,

Although we agree with most of the critical comments and suggestions which Otto Kernberg (2000, Int J. Psychoanal., 81: 97-120) has expressed in ‘a concerned critique of psychoanalytic education’, there are, nevertheless, some points which deserve further discussion.

The first issue pertains to Kernberg's presentation of the ‘traditional Eitingon-Model’, which regulates, as well as the later French model, the standard training of the IPA. The true revolution of the Berlin foundation was not just in its being a tripartite training institution. For it was conceived by Freud and Eitingon from the beginning as a research institution and as providing treatment free of charge for the general population, thus fulfilling Freud's (1919) Budapest requirement. It was in this sense that the Berlin ‘Ten-Years-Report’ (DPG, 1930) demonstrated the viability of psychoanalytic outcome research.

After the destruction of the Berlin Psychoanalytic Institute by the Nazis, what had been Freud's and Eitingon's concept degenerated into a mere tripartite training model, without a systematic research orientation and without free clinic treatments. Already by 1948, Michael Balint was complaining about this impoverishment:

The original idea: psychotherapy for the broad masses … became completely lost in the years of the development. It is a justified charge against us analysts that we are so little concerned about it, and only a fair consequence that the therapy of the masses is passing more and more into other hands and will eventually be solved—rightly or wrongly—without us.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.