Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Milton, J. (2001). Response. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 82(5):988-990.

(2001). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 82(5):988-990

Response Related Papers

Jane Milton

Dear Sirs,

I am very grateful for both these thoughtful and interesting responses to my paper, and for the opportunity to reply. I agree with Paolo Migone that one advantage of comparing psychoanalysis with a non-analytic approach is that it pushes one to define precisely what one means by psychoanalysis. It is also a valuable challenge to debate across different ‘psychoanalytic cultures’, as one's use of terms needs to be particularly clear. For example, I should have clarified that by using the terms ‘neutrality’ and ‘abstinence’ I was not suggesting that I subscribed to the myth of the ‘blank screen’ analyst. I was referring to the highly disciplined and somewhat counter-intuitive analytic stance, where one tries to contain one's immediate feelings and reactions, operating from a position of observation—of oneself, the patient and the relationship. Naturally the patient will react to everything one is and does (and doesn't do). However, at least we will have reduced some of the extraneous noise, and created for ourselves a baseline position. A more appropriate analogy than a blank screen, I think, would be a noisy, crowded room where you and another person are trying to talk. If you can't do anything else, at least you, the analyst, can turn the radio down!

I like the 1984 Gill paper that Migone refers to. If I have properly grasped it, Gill's way of thinking about the transference situation seems not unlike mine and that of many British post-Kleinian/Bionian colleagues.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.