Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gabbard, G.O., Williams, P. (2001). Preserving Confidentiality in the Writing of Case Reports. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 82(6):1067-1068.
   

(2001). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 82(6):1067-1068

Preserving Confidentiality in the Writing of Case Reports

Glen O. Gabbard and Paul Williams

One year ago former Editor-in-Chief David Tuckett (2000) wrote an editorial in these pages outlining his concerns about a statement issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) regarding the reporting of clinical events (ICMJE, 1995). In that statement the Editors argued that clinical accounts of patients should not be disguised in any way whatsoever. In addition, they suggested that informed consent must always be obtained from the patient who is the subject of a clinical report. In his editorial, and in an accompanying paper authored by one of the current Joint Editors-in-Chief (Gabbard, 2000), the ICMJE's approach to the publication of clinical reports was challenged for its rigidity and its poor suitability for psychoanalytic writing. We have since developed a more flexible strategy that we believe is more protective of the patient's privacy—a special concern in psychoanalytic writing that is ignored by the ICMJE statement. We feel strongly that the ethical need to protect the patient can coexist with the scientific need to maintain the integrity of clinical reporting. In the spirit of that compromise, we have adopted the following policy:

Writing about patients is essential for the advancement of psychoanalytic knowledge. Yet the need to communicate our clinical experience places analysts squarely in the middle of a conflict between the needs of the profession and the privacy of the patient. There is no perfect solution to this dilemma.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.