Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Winer, J.A. (2002). Psychoanalytic Case Formulation: Nancy McWilliams NY: The Guilford Press. 2000. Pp. 240.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 83(1):283-284.

(2002). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83(1):283-284

Psychoanalytic Case Formulation: Nancy McWilliams NY: The Guilford Press. 2000. Pp. 240.

Review by:
Jerome A. Winer, M.D.

These are times when we speak of psychoanalytic theories rather than psychoanalytic theory, and psychoanalytic techniques rather than technique. We also have empirical research findings to illuminate our understanding or perhaps to confuse us. An individual clinician must select and integrate the relevant factors in each case he or she sees. No wonder case formulation can be daunting to even the most experienced psychoanalytic psychotherapist. Thanks to Nancy McWilliams we have a readable text to teach students psychodynamic case formulation, one well sprinkled with clinical ‘pearls’ gained from the author's own extensive experience doing psychotherapy and psychoanalysis.

McWilliams aims to teach what is usually passed on through supervision. She writes to instruct the reader how to sail through the narrow strait between the Scylla of DSM diagnosis called for by third-party payers and the Charybdis of an irresponsible subjectivity that claims case formulation is unnecessarily academic. A professor of psychology, McWilliams also hopes to bring psychoanalytic ideas into classrooms where they have not been welcome previously. She is mindful of the limitations of assessment and treatment. She takes the position that part of a dynamic formulation is recognising those patients who cannot be treated with even the most encompassing psychodynamic approaches.

McWilliams believes that it is more important for the clinician to understand people than to master specific treatment techniques (p.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.