Gilmore, K. (2002). Child Psychoanalysis: Cathecting and Verbalising Affects in a New Rela... Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 83:473-477.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2002). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83:473-477

Child Psychoanalysis: Cathecting and Verbalising Affects in a New Relationship Aspects of the Analytic Method in Work With Children

Reported by:
Karen Gilmore Author Information

Moderated by:
Paul Brinich Author Information

Paul Brinich, the panel moderator, oriented the panel presentations in regard to four key questions raised by the title: (1) What does it mean to cathect an affect? (2) What is involved in verbalising an affect? (3) How does the relationship between the analyst and the child analysand contribute to these two processes? (4) How does our understanding of these two processes contribute to the ongoing development of technique in child analysis.

(1) What does in mean to cathect an affect? Freud believed it was the association of a quota of affect with an idea that created a cathexis. So how can you speak of cathecting an affect? Can an affect be present and not cathected, since by definition cathexis includes an affect? When a red balloon floats by, we can identify its colour as long as a source of light is present. Does the balloon ‘have’ a colour? Only when illuminated. Does analytic work illuminate affect that is present but not realised and in that sense achieve a

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.