Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Phillips, S.H. (2004). Reply to Drs Friedman and Downey. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(2):523-524.

(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(2):523-524

Reply to Drs Friedman and Downey Related Papers

Sidney H. Phillips

Dear Sirs,

Drs Friedman and Downey have written a thoughtful response to my article. Their additional perspectives—especially that of the psychobiological research they cite in their numerous and valuable works—rightly suggest that any search for the etiology of homosexuality lies outside of the exclusively psychoanalytic domain and must at least include research ‘findings from behavioral genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and other extra-analytic fields of knowledge’. In courses I teach at my local analytic institute on male and female homosexualities, Drs Friedman and Downey's erudite published works are featured prominently in the reading syllabi.

The emphasis in my paper (Phillips, 2003) was to highlight the outdated premises and misconceptualizations still prevalent in contemporary psychoanalytic discourse on homosexuality exemplified in Bergeret's (2002) article. In fact, I tried to demonstrate that these areas of conceptual confusion—including those to which Drs Friedman and Downey correctly allude (e.g. Oedipus complex, penis envy, castration anxiety)—are problematic precisely because some clinical theorists continue on an etiological witch-hunt for a purely psychoanalytic cause of homosexuality. These theorists forget the distinction between psychodynamic meanings of a phenomenon and its cause. Here I echo Drs Friedman and Downey's reminder of this vital point (2002, p. 41). Mitchell (1978), Leavy (1985), Lewes (1988) and Isay (1989, 1996) were pioneers in warning of the dangers of getting bogged down in such an extremely destructive therapeutic backwater—the misguided effort to ‘cure’ (i.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.