Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mitchell, J. (2004). The importance of sibling relationships in psychoanalysis By Prophecy Coles London: Karnac. 2003. 97 pp + references, index.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(2):557-561.

(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(2):557-561

The importance of sibling relationships in psychoanalysis By Prophecy Coles London: Karnac. 2003. 97 pp + references, index.

Review by:
Juliet Mitchell

Prophecy Coles opens her brief study of sibling relationships in psychoanalysis with a pleasant anecdote: a friend of hers recalls his joy when, as a small child, he had tea with his mother at Lyons Corner House. His brother must have been there, but the friend cannot recall or picture this brother's presence at all. For Coles this incident suggests the stance of the psychoanalyst as favoured only child who has forgotten the siblings. Freud whom she repeatedly grants ‘intuition’ is her chief example of someone who omits siblings because of his wish to be the ‘only child’. Hence, writes Coles, my argument throughout this book is that Freud's belief in the importance of these early experiences with siblings and peers drops out of his clinical theory and practice and remains at the stage of intuitive insight (p. 80). Because of this personal basis to observations of siblings in Freud (and Klein to whom she also devotes a chapter), Coles decides that psychoanalysis cannot claim universal ‘truth’ only personal truth. Her thesis consequently is that psychoanalysis should be seen as ‘the theorization of autobiography’.

Siblings raise important but difficult and problematic issues for psychoanalysis as a clinical and theoretical practice. Personal issues arise for all of us; that is the point of the training analysis, of self-analysis and the use of the countertransference. It is a matter of concern when personal issues escape these confines—as to some extent they always do. However, to turn this sine qua non of personal issues into a belief that psychoanalysis is a theory of autobiography is a simplistic resolution which does not confront but, on the contrary, confounds the problems. Coles may have done some service for siblings but in using them this way she has embarked on a disservice to psychoanalysis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.