Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ferro, A. (2004). Freud messo a fuoco [Freud in focus] Roberto Speziale-Bagliacca Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. 2002. 312 pp.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(3):767-772.

(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(3):767-772

Freud messo a fuoco [Freud in focus] Roberto Speziale-Bagliacca Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. 2002. 312 pp.

Review by:
Antonino Ferro

The original Italian title of this book is virtually untranslatable in English. Its deliberate ambiguity means both ‘Freud brought into focus’ and ‘Freud at the stake’, not to mention various other possible interpretations. Reading the book, my own personal musings immediately led me to think of a Freud who was ‘cooked’ rather than a Freud who was left ‘raw’ for too long. Levi-Strauss has told us much about this.

By ‘cooking’ Freud, I mean the work of elaborating and metabolising the thought and figure of Freud, which has to be done so that he does not remain ‘raw’, indigestible and undigested for us, a troubling source of persecution and idealisation. Therefore, by ‘cooked’ Freud, I mean a Freud who does not provide access to fideistic psychoanalytic religions, but who opens up towards a science in perennial transformation. A Freud who has his forerunners; a Freud who allows psychoanalysis to be that probe that constantly expands the field it explores, to quote a beautiful expression from Bion.

I have had the pleasure of reviewing Roberto Speziale-Bagliacca's latest books on various occasions; this time, when asked to write about this biography, I confess to having had certain misgivings. The history of psychoanalysis is not what I am most interested in, and I already feared having to face reading a book that was most probably important, but for me very arduous and perhaps even rather irritatingly hagiographical—as often occurs when analysts write about Freud (to the great joy of his detractors).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.