Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Basile, R. Tuckett, D. (2004). Multiple approaches: Case presentation (history, treatment report and follow-up). Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(4):987-989.

(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(4):987-989

Multiple approaches: Case presentation (history, treatment report and follow-up)

Reported by:
Roberto Basile

Moderator David Tuckett

This panel was the first in a series designed by the programme committee to examine different ways of working psychoanalytically. In the contemporary psychoanalytic ‘tower of Babel’ what are our differences, how far do we share common ground and, if so, what are its boundaries?

Thomä and Kächele's paper presented clinical material, discussed later by a range of authors from different approaches in subsequent panels. The authors offered what they called a ‘new form of treatment report’ which, if applied extensively, could become a basis for sharing and comparing experiences. The presenter was Thomä, head of the Psychotherapy Department of Ulm University, 1967-89, and director of the newly founded psychoanalytic institute housed under the same roof. He calls himself an analyst ‘on the way to an intersubjective relational understanding of the psychoanalytic process’. Kächele succeeded Thomä at Ulm in 1990.

Thomä made some initial general statements about his psychoanalytic thinking. He then gave an example of the application of his treatment report format in the case of Amalia. Amalia's case is one of the 12 completely audiotaped analyses and analytic therapies which are now stored in the Ulm text bank unit, director E. Mergenthaler.

Points 1-7 cover Thomä's views on comparative psychoanalysis. Point 8 describes Amalia's case.

1.   Thomä finds that, in view of the official recognition of psychoanalytic pluralism brought about by the courage of Wallerstein, we are now forced to compare various psychoanalytic techniques with each other.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.