Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ambrosiano, L. (2004). Il lavoro clinico. Nuovi seminari di São Paulo e Riberão Preto [Clinical work. New São Paulo and Riberão Preto seminars] By Antonino Ferro Milan: Cortina. 2003. 127 pp.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(4):1036-1038.

(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(4):1036-1038

Il lavoro clinico. Nuovi seminari di São Paulo e Riberão Preto [Clinical work. New São Paulo and Riberão Preto seminars] By Antonino Ferro Milan: Cortina. 2003. 127 pp.

Review by:
Laura Ambrosiano

Since the 1990s, Antonino Ferro has been developing a complex and coherent theoretical-technical model that indicates the shift specific to Italian psychoanalysis away from focusing pre-eminently on the representative to full recognition of the communicative value of the figurative register. This recognition has allowed the more silent, not yet symbolisable, inner dimensions of patients to be brought closer and has opened up prospects for the psychoanalytic treatment of psychoses.

The book collects together two thematic seminars and seven clinical seminars held by Ferro in 2000 in Brazil. Marta Petricciani's beautiful translation into Italian also leads the reader with great vivacity into the debates following the seminars.

The book is faithful to the author's preface in which he declares his loyalty to the orthodox, Freudian method, which, as Bion noted, widens the field to be explored, and his freedom to provide the patient with ‘heterodox’ answers. Ferro justifies this heterodoxy with his reflections on the risk that psychoanalysts run in using Freud's authority as a barrier to the search for knowledge. The risk of using our discipline like a religion is the other side of the question posed by Bion: who knows if we will be able to study the ‘living mind’.

All theories, as the author points out (p. 10), tend to ‘become wooden’, to crystallise until they become dogmas, with the inevitable consequence of peopling the clinical and organisational practice with priests of orthodoxy.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.