Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).
You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Slade, L. (2004). On: Writing about patients III. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(5):1273-1274.
(2004). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85(5):1273-1274
On: Writing about patients III
I welcome Judy L. Kantrowitz's contribution to your continuing exploration of this important subject(2004).
Kantrowitz includes comments from analysts on the refusal by patients to agree to publication of written material about the analysis (2004, pp. 696-7). She notes that in only one instance did the analyst elaborate his reflections and what he learned from the process (p. 697). Lipton (1991), cited by Kantrowitz, reviewed the then existing analytical literature on confidentiality, and noted the lack of comment on the difficulties involved in asking patients for permission to publish clinical material.
Elphis Christopher (2003), a UK-based Jungian analyst, has written a compelling account of her experience of seeking permission from a former patient to write about their work, some time after analytical psychotherapy with the patient had been concluded. What followed was an extended dialogue in which both parties relived painful aspects of the therapy. In the end, it was decided not to publish an account of the therapy itself.
Christopher concludes, ‘It might be questioned whether asking the patient's permission to publish … was worth the struggle and pain involved. Paradoxically, perhaps, I think that for this patient the answer is an affirmative one’ (p. 322).
However, that is only the therapist's view. The patient's view is not recorded.
What concerns me in such situations is that the dialogue about publication is generally initiated by the therapist—not out of a sense of what might be beneficial for the patient, but because therapists need to share information about their work.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]