Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Green, A. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 86(3):627-632.

(2005). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(3):627-632

The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism Language Translation

André Green

When, during his presidency of the International Psychoanalytical Association, Robert S. Wallerstein on two occasions (1988, 1990) expressed the view that there existed a common ground in psychoanalysis beyond the many signs of divergence on a scale that was becoming a concern and a preoccupation for the future of psychoanalysis, he wanted to generate a glimmer of hope in a grey sky. I do not think that these circumstances are accidental and I cannot see who else but the IPA president would be capable of having such an idea and being prompted by the same intentions. I now think that this was—and remains—a political act. I am not using this adjective in any kind of pejorative sense. It seems to me that it is entirely within a president's prerogative to foster a unity between the members of his association that transcends geographical and ideological boundaries. Just as any good father attempts to reduce differences of opinion between his children, when each has adopted different political viewpoints, often contradictory or even incompatible, Robert S. Wallerstein was undertaking a highly well-intentioned manoeuvre in order to give us the courage to confront the difficult times ahead that could already be foreseen for psychoanalysis.

In his latest contribution, he relates with his customary candour the history of the movements that have dominated successively in the various parts of the psychoanalytic world, both during Freud's lifetime and since his death. However,

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.