Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Abella, A. Zilkha, N. (2005). Response to Dr Sheppard. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 86(3):899-900.

(2005). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(3):899-900

Response to Dr Sheppard Related Papers

Adela Abella and Nathalie Zilkha

Dear Sirs,

Sheppard raises the general problem as to the nature of ‘errors’ in the psychoanalytic interpretation of a cultural production. When a psychoanalyst puts forward a particular understanding, how are we to determine whether this reading is ‘correct’, pertinent and free of errors? Moreover, does it make sense to frame the question in these terms?

Freud approached art in several different ways. The first of these approaches, expanded in his study of Leonardo da Vinci (1910), seeks to link the representational content of a work with the supposed unconscious conflicts of the author. On the contrary, in his work on Gradiva (1907), Freud seeks to describe the unconscious of the work rather than the unconscious of the author. Freud then considers the work as a manifest content based on the model of the dream. From this perspective, the work of art is the product of a secondary processing that reveals traces of primary processes just as the dream does. It is precisely these traces that will be apprehended by the unconscious of the recipient through an evenly suspended listening that is akin to free association. This non-directed ‘imprecise’ listening, which may entail apparent ‘errors’, enables the viewer to ‘turn his own unconscious like a receptive organ towards the transmitting unconscious(Freud, 1912).

From this point of view, to return to Dogville, we can say that arrogance is expressed in turn by the father, by Grace and by other characters as well.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.