Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review the bibliography…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

It is always useful to review an article’s bibliography and references to get a deeper understanding of the psychoanalytic concepts and theoretical framework in it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

De Bianchedi, E.T. (2005). Whose Bion? Who is Bion?. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 86(6):1529-1534.

(2005). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(6):1529-1534

Whose Bion? Who is Bion? Language Translation

Elizabeth Tabak De Bianchedi

What I have said about the psycho-analytical sessions I consider applies to the experience of reading psycho-analytic work. Freud's paper should be read, and ‘forgotten’. Only in this way is it possible to produce the conditions in which, when it is next read, it can stimulate the evolution of further development. There is time to do this only with the best papers; but only the best papers have the power to stimulate a defensive reading (of what the paper is about) as a substitute for experiencing the paper itself—what I have elsewhere called Transformation under K as contrasted with Transformation under O.

(Bion, Second thoughts, 1967, p. 156)

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.