Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly go to the Table of Volumes from any article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To quickly go to the Table of Volumes from any article, click on the banner for the journal at the top of the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fuqua, P.B. (2005). How analysts think and why they think the way they do: Reflections on three psychoanalytic hours Edited by Arden Aibel Rothstein and Samuel Abrams Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 2003. 165 pp.. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 86(6):1735-1737.

(2005). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(6):1735-1737

How analysts think and why they think the way they do: Reflections on three psychoanalytic hours Edited by Arden Aibel Rothstein and Samuel Abrams Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 2003. 165 pp.

Review by:
Paula B. Fuqua

This book evolved out of a conference celebrating the 50th anniversary of the New York University Psychoanalytic Institute at the New York University Medical Center. At the meeting Dr. Claudia Lament presented a case to four discussants: Kathleen Lyon, Shelley Orgel, Peter Neubauer and M. Nasir Ilahi. The first three come from a more or less ‘classical Freudian’ perspective according to the editors, and Ilahi represents the British object-relations point of view. What is unusual about this volume is that the editors decided after the conference to engage the participants in further written dialog. Thus, we have here two more cycles of interaction among the discussants.

While the title of the volume suggests the book will explain how and why analysts think the way they do, I would like to paraphrase that to ‘how some analysts think.’ The perspective of self-psychology and outlook of a relational analyst were missing, though self-psychological thinking had clearly influenced some of the participants. Nor did I come away with a very solid idea of the ‘why’ they think of the clinical material as necessitating the particular theoretical perspective that each has, rather than any other. That said, I enjoyed the dialog immensely. I read most of the book riding home from work on the bus and I found myself wishing that the trip were longer so I would not have to stop reading. What I liked about the book was the detailed clinical material and the

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.