Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Migone, P. (2007). Mentalization, Insightfulness, and Therapeutic Action. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 88(3):772-773.

(2007). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 88(3):772-773

Mentalization, Insightfulness, and Therapeutic Action

Paolo Migone

Dear Editors,

Alan Sugarman's (2006) article of the role of insight in therapeutic action deals with a problem that is at the heart of psychoanalysis. The author states that the old debates over the relative roles of interpretation versus relationship with the analyst, as contributing to structural change, ‘are based on traditional definitions of insight as gaining knowledge of unconscious content’ (p. 965), and suggests a redefinition of the concept of insight. According to the author, ‘a way out of this debate is to redefine insight as a process, one that is called insightfulness’ (p. 965), and goes on explaining in detail how and why his suggestion can better account for a more consistent and up-to-date theory of therapeutic action in psychoanalysis.

I fully agree with Sugarman's ideas and I appreciated his article. However, I am surprised by the fact that he seems to have reached these conclusions without considering that the very same revision of the concept of insight was put forth by Kris (1956). Kris, in this classic paper, discussed in depth the clinical and theoretical aspects of insight, and explicitly advocated a change of the concept of insight from ‘content’ to ‘process’, where the key aspect becomes the ‘function of insight’ and not its mere content. In other words, insight is important not for its veridical aspects, nor for the fact that its content is remembered, since it can be forgotten, but for the interstructural changes between the ego and the id. According to the structural model, in fact, the ego can also be unconscious, and what matters are changes in the relationship between structures. (Incidentally, psychoanalysts have known for many years that false insights can be mutative, see Glover, 1931).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.