Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Civitarese, G. (2008). ‘Caesura’ as Bion's Discourse on Method. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 89(6):1123-1143.

(2008). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 89(6):1123-1143

Psychoanalytic Theory and Technique

‘Caesura’ as Bion's Discourse on Method

Guiseppe Civitarese

The author contends that Caesura, one of Bion's last works, can he read as the equivalent of Descartes's Discourse on Method. In this compact and complex text, the dictate of ‘methodical’ and ‘hyperbolic doubt’ —so called because it is taken to the extreme form of application to the faculty of thought itself — which, for Descartes, represents the fundamental principle of philosophical and scientific research, is reflected in the formula of ‘transcending the caesura’. Bion directs his attention successively to the pairs of opposing concepts that structure psychoanalytic discourse and demonstrates their paradoxical and non-separative logic. The binary system of producing meaning is deconstructed through the systematic use of non-pathological — i.e. not static but dynamicreversible perspective. A viewpoint that appears natural, self-evident and primary is plunged into crisis and proves to be founded on what the punctuation mark of the slash excludes. Yet the new point of view does not supplant its predecessor, but supplements it. The conceptual opposition is not overturned, but merely destabilized in such a way as to maintain a creative tension that generates new thoughts. By this technique of wrong-footing the reader, Bion achieves what is tantamount to a Kuhnian revolution: the transition from Freud's semiotic or evidential paradigm to an aesthetic one, centred on emotional experience — to a ‘science of at-one-ment’. Working with the antithetical concepts of censorship and caesura, the author illustrates some clinical implications of this radical shift.

(Final version accepted 31 July 2008)

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.