Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To sort articles by sourceā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Benjamin, J. (2009). Response. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 90(3):457-462.

(2009). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 90(3):457-462

Response Related Papers

Jessica Benjamin

I believe that Vic Sedlak is correct in asserting that there is a distinction between intersubjectivity as it is understood in some psychoanalytic literature (usual in his cultural context) and the idea as it appears in relational analysis (which may indeed be radical but is common in North America). The idea that the data and the relationship between analyst and patient are co-created means something different in each context, and we define this difference differently. In order to address the clinical manifestations it seems wise to clarify the very different assumptions at work.

I should start with Sedlak's statement that (1) what defines the intersubjective approach is the necessity of using our own personality subjectivity to understand the patient, and (2) that it is an unfortunate fact that we have no other means, or measuring instrument to judge meaning and emotional quality, so we must make the best of a bad job. My view, by contrast (see Benjamin, 2005) is developmental and postulates that (1) intersubjectivity is constituted by the fact that from the beginning of life we depend on creating patterns of mutual regulation and recognition with the other in order to develop. Experiencing and understanding together these patterns and failures associated with them form the heart of our work. (2) Since recognition of intentions and feelings of one by another are the crucial building blocks of attachment and all subsequent personal engagement, it is not a “bad job” that we use ourselves in analysis.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.